Inside the brain of the smartest man in Washington

Paul Urges Social Security Fairness for Texas Teachers

October 18th, 2006

Lake Jackson, Texas: Congressman Ron Paul recently joined more than 120 of his congressional colleagues in demanding action on legislation that will end the unfair practice of cutting Social Security benefits for Texas teachers.

Many Texas teachers (and other public employees) work for school districts or local government entities that do not participate in the Social Security system. Many of these individuals still qualify for Social Security benefits through their work for other employers, or through their spouses. Upon retirement, however, their Social Security benefits are cut- or even eliminated- based on a federal law that deems their Texas pensions a “windfall.” This is fundamentally unfair, and leaves thousands of teachers with less retirement income than they would receive based on the same earnings with another employer.

“I strongly oppose the current laws that restrict the ability of citizens and their spouses to collect full Social Security benefits just because they worked as teachers, government employees, or railroad employees,” Paul stated. “Furthermore, a retired public employee should not have surviving spouse benefits reduced simply because the surviving spouse was a government employee. Therefore, I fully support repealing the so-called ‘windfall elimination’ provision and the government pension offset. Congress needs to act this year to end this injustice.”

Congressman Paul is an original cosponsor of HR 147, legislation that repeals both the “windfall elimination” provision and the government pension offset in federal law. Paul yesterday signed a “discharge petition,” which is a powerful procedural device in Congress that allows HR 147 to bypass all committees and come directly to the House floor for a vote.

Similar posts:

Paul Opposes NAFTA Superhighway

October 4th, 2006

Washington: Congressman Ron Paul joined several of his congressional colleagues in expressing outrage at the planned “NAFTA superhighway” that will require eminent domain actions on an enormous scale in Texas and beyond. H.Con.Res 487, introduced by Virginia Representative Virgil Goode and cosponsored by Paul, expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA superhighway or enter into any plans to create a North American Union between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.

Plans for such a superhighway are part of the so-called “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which is neither a treaty nor a formal agreement. Rather, the SPP is a “dialogue” launched by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco, Texas in March 2005.

According to the SPP website, this dialogue will create new supra-national organizations to coordinate border security, health policy, economic and trade policy, and energy policy between the three governments. As such, it is but an extension of the NAFTA and CAFTA agreements– government trade schemes that bypass the express constitutional authority of Congress to regulate trade.

“This is a matter of national sovereignty,” Paul stated. “Any movement toward a North American Union diminishes the ability of average Americans to influence the laws under which they must live. The SPP agreement, which includes plans for a major transnational superhighway through Texas, is moving forward without congressional oversight– and that is an outrage. The administration needs a strong message from Congress that the American people will not tolerate backroom deals that threaten our sovereignty.”

Similar posts: