During Debate on the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2000
August 2nd, 1999Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support for this amendment. If it were true that this agency (OPIC) is profitable, we would not be here. They would be making profit, and OPIC would not need to come here every year.
They are asking for $55 million. Where does the profit come from? It was stated earlier very clearly; from the interest they earn. They have a portfolio of $3 billion of U.S. securities.
But these did not reduce the national debt. That is part of the national debt. We pay interest on that $3 billion. And this agency gets $194 million from it, four times the amount of the requested appropriation.
No wonder on paper it looks profitable. And they say, well, the private companies will not insure some of these projects. That means it is probably risky. Why should the taxpayer assume the risk? Why should these corporations be protected with this corporate welfare?
This is the reason why jobs are exported at a cost to the American taxpayer. It is bad economics. And it is a lot of twisting of the facts if we call this agency profitable at the same time they are getting $194 million that we barely talk about.
How many other agencies of government get interest like this? This is almost a government unto itself, the fact that it has that much financing without even a direct appropriation because it is paid out of the interest budget.
This is indeed a very important amendment. I believe that we should definitely vote for this. If we care at all about the taxpayer of this country, we should expose what is happening with corporate welfare.
The little people are not coming to us today begging us to vote against this amendment. It is the corporations, the giant corporations, not our small mom-and-pop businesses. They are not coming and saying, please, please protect OPIC. No, it is the giant corporations that have been able to manipulate and get benefits from programs like this.
| Short permalink: | |
| Source: | http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec99/cr080299.htm |
Similar posts
- 1997: During Debate on the Royce Amendment to Cut Opic
- 1998: Appointment of Conferees on H.R. 3579, 1998 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act
- 1999: During Debate on and Amendment Offered by Mr. Paul to Limit the Funds for Export-Import Bank of the United States, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and the Trade and Development Agency
- 1997: Paul introducing pro-life, pro-America amendments to Foreign Ops Act
- 1997: Debate on the Paul Amendment to Cut Corporate Welfare
- 2008: Statement on HR 6599, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs
- 2002: Statement before the House Capital Markets Subcommittee
- 2002: Export-Import Bank is Corporate Welfare
- 2003: Don’t Antagonize our Trading Partners
- 1997: Debate on the Communist China Subsidy Reduction Act of 1997