Inconsistancy in Foriegn Policy
November 5th, 1997Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the Congress has never earned high marks for consistency. We do spend many hours debating the minor differences in the management of many centralized programs that are generally unwarranted. But when it comes to foreign policy, I see both sides of the aisle are eagerly agreeing with the President that we must threaten force and use of force in Iraq.
Yet, Mr. Speaker, there is no indication that this is a proper position. We have been told by the Ambassador to the United Nations that the reason we must threaten force in this area is that it is a direct threat to the security of the United Nations. Here all along I thought I was here in the Congress to protect the security of the United States.
We are inconsistent because the majority of Americans want us out of Bosnia. Most Members of Congress argue and vote to get us out of Bosnia. There is no indication that we are going to get out of Bosnia. Yet, here we are, chanting away that we should use force and threaten force in Bosnia. We do not have that same policy with China.
| Short permalink: | |
| Source: | http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec97/cr110597.htm |
Similar posts
- 1997: The Sooner We Get Out of Bosnia, the Better
- 1998: U.S. Obsession with Worldwide Military Occupation Policy
- 1997: On Bosnia
- 1997: America’s Foreign Policy
- 1998: Directing the President to Remove U.S. Armed Forces from Bosnia-Herzegovina
- 1997: Paul calls UN meddling in US law enforcement unconscionable
- 2001: America Not Getting a Fair Shake from the United Nations
- 2000: Minding Our Own Business Regarding Colombia is in the Best Interest of America
- 2007: Statement Introducing a Bill to Establish a Sunset for the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243)
- 2007: Don’t Do It, Mr. President